One share can be shorted multiple times. This needs to stop.

-

In light of what happened with Gamestop and AMC's respective stocks, there will be lots of hearings and calls for reforms in short-selling. What I really hope is that predatory hedge funds and their lobbyists don't get their way and undo SEC rule 204, which regulates the close out requirements for shorts- i.e. when a short seller is on the hook to actually buy a stock they borrowed. 

Currently, short-sellers are forced to deliver on their short sale transaction by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the settlement day following the settlement date. The predatory hedge funds will call for this requirement to be relaxed to give short sellers more time to buy the stock and close their positions. They will argue that giving short sellers more time will reduce the rush to buy back the shares and help avoid a short squeeze. Giving them more time will only enable them perform these charades on many more good companies - they almost destroyed Tesla not so long ago. 

What needs to be reformed is preventing the same share from being shorted multiple times. This is one of the primary reasons why GameStop short interest exceeded 140%.

I know that float doesn't include everything that is outstanding. There are restricted stocks that are held by institutions, investment funds, board members etc., and these don't float on the exchange. A short seller could borrow shares from these institutions, so it is possible for shorts to exceed float. However, in GameStop's case, the total outstanding shares were lower than the number of shares sold short. This happened because a short-seller (A) could borrow a share, sell it to someone (B), B's broker could then lend the same share to another short-seller (C) to sell it short again. This needs to end. Multiple people cannot own the same one share. 

I know short selling is a vital part of the ecosystem: it protects us from overpriced stocks, and protects us from pump and dump actions. Melvin Capital, Citadel and the other predatory hedge funds involved in GameStop's short sale were expecting GameStop to go bankrupt, meaning they'd never have to cover (return the shares). That's why they kept shorting the stock even when shorts exceeded the number of outstanding shares. 

These punks had it coming. They can't sell what doesn't exist. I hope the SEC identifies this as one of the major gaps in existing securities laws and rules.

Disclaimer: This post is merely my own assessment and is not an investment recommendation. For professional advice, seek input from a licensed investment advisor.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin and the 99 other coins

-
So far Bitcoin is having a decent 2021. It hit a record high of more than $41.5K last week, continuing the upward trajectory it has been on since April of last year, when a single Bitcoin cost less than $5K. That rise now means that the sum of all Bitcoins in existence is worth more than $700B.  Because Bitcoin dominates much of the media's attention, it can be easy to forget just how many other cryptocurrencies there are. A quick look through the full list from coinmarketcap reveals over 100 alternative cryptocurrencies with a "market cap" of more than $100M. Each hoping that their unique take on the core blockchain technology will be enough to propel them out of obscurity, to where Bitcoin is today. With some of the names on the list you can't help but think someone is having a joke, or planning something nefarious - there is a "dogecoin", "YEP COIN", "OMG" and even "SushiSwap" (???). This time it's... different? Some of
Read more

Why the stock market is beating expectations

-
Image
  In the early stages of the pandemic, the S&P 500 index dropped a third of its value. Since then it has roared back, soaring more than 50 percent from its low in late March and setting an all-time high last week. This seems very implausible when set against the current state of the economy and the ongoing devastation caused by the pandemic. So why is the stock market rallying in the face of a pandemic and bad economic news? Several explanations are plausible. The stock market is not the economy: The stock market represents publicly traded companies only; it’s not the whole market. Most importantly, it’s always forward looking; i.e. it’s an indicator of the future earnings of those companies and how they would fare in the future. A rising stock market indicates that investors think these companies will do better in the future. On the other hand, a falling stock indicates that investors are pessimistic about the future earnings of companies. Continued income support for the econom
Read more

Netflix: No more burn?

-
In the last article on Netflix , I discussed why Netflix's promise to premiere a movie every week is not an overly ambitious strategy for the streaming giant. It's a brilliant move that isn't risky because Netflix can keep spending at this high rate for a long time. Yesterday's earnings call confirmed this. During the call, Netflix announced that it does not intend to raise any more capital, through debt or equity, as it plans to be cash-neutral this year and cash-flow positive beyond 2021. Looks like all those price increases are flowing through to the bottom line. Of course, saying you don't need any more capital is a really great way of getting people to offer you more capital at even more attractive rates (if you ever did want it).
Read more